Not taking husband's name? Prepare to be judged.
When I saw the title of the article, I was like, “Yeah. No shit, Sherlock. Tell me something I don’t know.” But after reading the article, it was more informative than you might think. I’d actually be interested in reading the full study.
According to a new study, one of the few to look at name-changing attitudes over time, Midwestern college students were three times more likely to say that women who don’t take their husbands’ names are less committed to the relationship in 2006 compared with when the same question was asked in 1990.
More at the link.
-
peterpangal365 liked this
-
lovelymissnallely reblogged this from bbc03indisguise
-
liberalfeministinnj reblogged this from bbc03indisguise and added:
I’m surprised that this still is controversial. I married in 1987 and kept “my name” because it was “my name.” My...
-
sequinsandcitations liked this
-
charlietangofoxtrot reblogged this from bbc03indisguise and added:
Ahhhhh! I know all of these people!!! And the places they sampled! David Johnson is an outstanding methodologist (one of...
-
ceaselesspoverty reblogged this from bbc03indisguise
-
chockfullofhoot reblogged this from velocipedestrienne and added:
That’s pretty fucking annoying. I know of only 2 colleges in Iowa that are that small and NOT religiously affiliated...
-
bbc03indisguise reblogged this from velocipedestrienne and added:
This is why I’d prefer to see the full study instead of just this summary of it. Because it mentions that prior research...
-
velocipedestrienne reblogged this from bbc03indisguise and added:
link. “Pennsylvania State University sociologists Laurie Scheuble and David Johnson, along with graduate student...
-
sarahmcnamaraundercover liked this
-
bbc03indisguise posted this
